Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10923/1071
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorJones, Christopher R.-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Ricardo B.-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Helena W.-
dc.contributor.authorHüttner, Edison-
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Marlise A.-
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Maria Helena Itaqui-
dc.contributor.authorRussomano, Thais-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-18T14:38:16Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-18T14:38:16Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1750-6166en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10923/1071-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – Reducing inequity in accessing healthcare among rural and remote populations remains a problem. Internationally, eHealth is now touted as a potential solution, with a range of diverse approaches and impacts. Yet, the equity gains of implementing eHealth are often not realized due to a lack of effective strategies for citizen participation. The purpose of this paper is to present the background to, and results of, a multidisciplinary eHealth assistance project in a remote region of the Brazilian Amazon, highlighting the importance of citizen participation within planning processes. Design/methodology/approach – The project was conducted in three phases – pre-mission, mission, and post-mission. Discussions were held between health teams and local community leaders, and were coordinated by government health organizations in partnership with the Amazon State University. A multidisciplinary team visited five remote communities in the Brazilian Amazon, where participants underwent clinical assessment using eHealth technologies within pharmacy, cardiology, dermatology, and/or odontology. Analysis and second opinion were provided by relevant specialists and the results were delivered electronically to local healthcare teams. Findings – A total of 111 patients were evaluated with an average age of 54 years. There were several important findings following specialist second opinion, which improved the quality of care they received. These comprise identifying drug interactions and patients requiring further investigation for cardiological and dermatological complaints, including suspected malignancy. Research limitations/implications – Due to a breakdown in communication, data from the post-mission phase are lacking, particularly regarding treatment outcomes. Furthermore, the authors did not perform an analysis of cost-effectiveness. If eHealth technologies are to become part of routine clinical practice it is important that the financial implications are acceptable. Originality/value – This Project demonstrates how equity can be designed for with a multidisciplinary approach to eHealth activities in rural and remote environments within Brazil. Such activities typically focus on one particular area, yet primary healthcare facilities see patients with a variety of problems.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.relation.ispartofTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2012; 6(4):333-44.en_US
dc.subjecteHEALTHen_US
dc.subjectEQUITYen_US
dc.subjectCITZEN PARTICIPATIONen_US
dc.subjectTELEMEDICINEen_US
dc.subjectAMAZON REGIONen_US
dc.subjectHEALTH CAREen_US
dc.subjectTELEMEDICINAen_US
dc.subjectMEDICINAen_US
dc.titleTowards designing for equity: Active citzen participation in eHealthen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/17506161211267400en_US
dc.jtitleTransforming Government: People, Process and Policyen_US
dc.volume6en_US
dc.issue4en_US
dc.spage333en_US
dc.epage344en_US
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo de Periódico

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Towards designing for equity - active citizen participation in eHealth.pdfTexto Completo436,21 kBAdobe PDFAbrir
Ver


Todos los ítems en el Repositorio de la PUCRS están protegidos por derechos de autor, con todos los derechos reservados, y están bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional. Sepa más.